نوشته اصلی توسط
amir_Pishtaz
فعلا ادیتور هیچی نگفته....فقط میگه این کامنت ها دوباره در نظر بگیریم و مقاله رو متناسب با ان ویرایش کنم!
I suggest you consider these comments, suggestions and questions and revise your article accordingly.
اینم کامنت های داوران:
Reviewer #1: After the first revision, the paper has shown a comprehensive detailed information related to development in renewable energy. I would recommend this paper to be published in the Journal of .....
Reviewer #2: Dear Authors,
you have replied to almost all of my comments in a satisfactory way. I think the paper quality meets the required standards for publication in high quality journals. However, my main doubt still remains: in my opinion, this kind of research may be more in line with other journals (Energy Conversion and Management, Applied Thermal Engineering to cite some...), where you may meet a readership that is more suited to this kind of topics. Indeed, even if the "energy efficiency" is one of the topics of this paper, the outcomes of the research related to energy efficiency should actually be related to cleaner production and sustainability. Therefore, I confirm my last decision and I recommend to reject this paper, and I warmly suggest to the Authors to resubmit their valuable research to another Journal.
علاقه مندی ها (Bookmarks)