سلام دوستان.
من وقتی پیغام های دوستان رو میخونم که مقاله اشون اکسپت شده و یا حداقل ریوایز خورده و چاپ شده، واقعا غبطه میخورم.
من از پایان نامه ارشدم 2 تا مقاله فعلاً استخراج کردم ( رشته ام مدیریته و پایان نامم در ارتباط با مدیریت ریسک و نوآوری بود) ولی یکش رو فعلا ادیت انگلیسی کردم ودر چند ژورنال از الزویر ، اشپیرینگر و تیلور وفرانسیس سابمیت کردم ولی هربار توسط ادیتور همون اول کار ریجکت میشه خوب هر وقت پیغام ریجکت میبینم سعی می کنم نظرات ادیتور رو اعمال کنم و کارم رو اصلاح کنم ولی باز هم ژورنال بعدی ریجکت می کنه که آخریش همین شب گذشته بود(مجموعاً 4بار).
واقعا دیگه نا امیدم.
Before sending a manuscript to review, I look at a few significant elements to see whether the paper in its current form has a significant chance of making it past the reviewers. This is to save everyone’s time and facilitate a smooth and quick reviewing process.
While the topic of your manuscript is interesting and worthwhile, I also have serious concerns. My concerns are serious enough to be doubtful that a publishable version could be achieved in the course of one round of major revision. Therefore, I regret to inform you that I unfortunately feel it is unsuitable for publication in Innovation: Organization & Management.
I have to say that the link between risk and innovation is indeed interesting, and as you imply there is already a literature on this. However, among the issues that I identified with the manuscript is the relative underdevelopment of the paper in terms of theory; in order words the hypotheses are insufficiently theorized and the mechanisms that are posed to be responsible for engendering the outcomes do do not come out in sufficient clarity. Second, and more significantly, your data do not allow you to control for endogeneity, e.g. inverse causality: more innovative companies will usually have more sophisticated risk control mechanisms. At least we would need to see control variables. A third issue is that the language of the manuscript is lacking, and it does not seem to have been compiled with utmost care (there is even a mistake in the abstract). The manuscript does not seem to have been copyedited by a professional.
I know this will be a disappointment but I am confident that this is the right decision. I would nevertheless like to encourage you to continue working on your material.
البته در کل توضیحاتی که ادیتور داده خوبه ولی دو بار تو دو هفته ریجکت بشه مقاله ادم کمی دلسرد میشه. اینطور نیست؟
پاسخ : فرایند داوری مقالات (مدت زمان داوری، الگوی داوری
پاسخ با نقل قول
نوشته اصلی توسط mostanad
با اینکه روشش را کلی انتقاد کردم ولی خیلی منصفانه نظر داده و تعریف کرده.
علاقه مندی ها (Bookmarks)